Selected research
Market Outlook & Growth Opportunities
Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market Outlook and Growth Opportunities 2026
Market perspective
The global Computing Power Scheduling Platform market was valued at US$ million in 2026 and is projected to reach US$ million by 2032, implying a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of % over 2026-2032.
The North America market for Computing Power Scheduling Platform is projected to increase from US$ million in 2026 to US$ million by 2032, at a CAGR of % over 2026-2032.
The Europe market for Computing Power Scheduling Platform is projected to increase from US$ million in 2026 to US$ million by 2032, at a CAGR of % over 2026-2032.
Read the full market overview
The Asia Pacific market for Computing Power Scheduling Platform is projected to increase from US$ million in 2026 to US$ million by 2032, at a CAGR of % over 2026-2032.
In China, the Computing Power Scheduling Platform market is projected to increase from US$ million in 2026 to US$ million by 2032, at a CAGR of % over 2026-2032.
Major global companies in the Computing Power Scheduling Platform market include Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Alibaba Cloud, Huawei Cloud, IBM, Slurm, NVIDIA and Tencent, among others. In 2025, the top three vendors together accounted for approximately % of global market revenue.
This report provides an overview of the global Computing Power Scheduling Platform market in terms of revenue and gross margin, analyzing global market trends using historical revenue data for 2021-2025, estimates for 2026, and projected CAGRs through 2032.
The study covers key producers of Computing Power Scheduling Platform and market revenue by major regions and countries, assesses future market potential, and highlights priority regions and countries for segmenting the market into sub-sectors, with country-specific market value data for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Brazil, China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia, India, Germany, the U.K., Italy, the Middle East, Africa, and other countries.
The report also presents Computing Power Scheduling Platform revenue, market share, and industry ranking for the main companies for 2021-2026, identifies the major stakeholders in the global market, and analyzes their competitive landscape and market positioning based on recent developments and segmental revenues.
Across the 2021-2026 period, the analysis compares revenue growth and profitability profiles by company, distinguishing participants with sustained expansion from those with more cyclical performance, and relates these patterns to differences in regional exposure, product portfolios, and application focus in the global Computing Power Scheduling Platform market.
Computing Power Scheduling Platform Segment by Company
Amazon
Microsoft
Alibaba Cloud
Huawei Cloud
IBM
Slurm
NVIDIA
Tencent
Computing Power Scheduling Platform Segment by Type
Cloud Computing Scheduling Platform
Edge Computing Scheduling Platform
Others
Computing Power Scheduling Platform Segment by Application
Energy Industry
Education Industry
Financial Industry
Others
Computing Power Scheduling Platform Segment by Region
North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Spain
Netherlands
Switzerland
Sweden
Poland
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
India
Australia
Taiwan
Southeast Asia
South America
Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Middle East & Africa
Egypt
South Africa
Israel
Türkiye
GCC Countries
Study Objectives
1. To analyze and research the global Computing Power Scheduling Platform status and future forecast, involving, revenue, growth rate (CAGR), market share, historical and forecast.
2. To present the Computing Power Scheduling Platform key companies, revenue, market share, and recent developments.
3. To split the Computing Power Scheduling Platform breakdown data by regions, type, companies, and application.
4. To analyze the global and key regions Computing Power Scheduling Platform market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints, and risks.
5. To identify Computing Power Scheduling Platform significant trends, drivers, influence factors in global and regions.
6. To analyze Computing Power Scheduling Platform competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
Reasons to Buy This Report
1. This report will help the readers to understand the competition within the industries and strategies for the competitive environment to enhance the potential profit. The report also focuses on the competitive landscape of the global Computing Power Scheduling Platform market, and introduces in detail the market share, industry ranking, competitor ecosystem, market performance, new product development, operation situation, expansion, and acquisition. etc. of the main players, which helps the readers to identify the main competitors and deeply understand the competition pattern of the market.
2. This report will help stakeholders to understand the global industry status and trends of Computing Power Scheduling Platform and provides them with information on key market drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.
3. This report will help stakeholders to understand competitors better and gain more insights to strengthen their position in their businesses. The competitive landscape section includes the market share and rank (in sales and value), competitor ecosystem, new product development, expansion, and acquisition.
4. This report stays updated with novel technology integration, features, and the latest developments in the market.
5. This report helps stakeholders to gain insights into which regions to target globally.
6. This report helps stakeholders to gain insights into the end-user perception concerning the adoption of Computing Power Scheduling Platform.
7. This report helps stakeholders to identify some of the key players in the market and understand their valuable contribution.
Chapter Outline
Chapter 1: Introduces the report scope of the report, global total market size.
Chapter 2: Analysis key trends, drivers, challenges, and opportunities within the global Computing Power Scheduling Platform industry.
Chapter 3: Detailed analysis of Computing Power Scheduling Platform company competitive landscape, revenue market share, latest development plan, merger, and acquisition information, etc.
Chapter 4: Provides the analysis of various market segments by type, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different market segments.
Chapter 5: Provides the analysis of various market segments by application, covering the market size and development potential of each market segment, to help readers find the blue ocean market in different downstream markets.
Chapter 6: Sales value of Computing Power Scheduling Platform in regional level. It provides a quantitative analysis of the market size and development potential of each region and introduces the market development, future development prospects, market space, and market size of key country in the world.
Chapter 7: Sales value of Computing Power Scheduling Platform in country level. It provides sigmate data by type, and by application for each country/region.
Chapter 8: Provides profiles of key players, introducing the basic situation of the main companies in the market in detail, including revenue, gross margin, product introduction, recent development, etc.
Chapter 9: Concluding Insights.
More report detail
Tables and figures
Scope & coverage.
Types
- Cloud Computing Scheduling Platform
- Edge Computing Scheduling Platform
- Others
Applications
- Energy Industry
- Education Industry
- Financial Industry
- Others
Companies covered
- Amazon
- Microsoft
- Alibaba Cloud
- Huawei Cloud
- IBM
- Slurm
- NVIDIA
- Tencent
Inside the report.
1 Market Overview
- 1.1 Product Definition
- 1.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market Size, 2021 VS 2025 VS 2032
- 1.3 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market Size (2021-2032)
- 1.4 Assumptions and Limitations
- 1.5 Study Goals and Objectives
2 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market Dynamics
- 2.1 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Industry Trends
- 2.2 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Industry Drivers
- 2.3 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Industry Opportunities and Challenges
- 2.4 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Industry Restraints
3 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market by Company
- 3.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Company Revenue Ranking in 2025
- 3.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue by Company (2021-2026)
- 3.3 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Company Ranking (2024-2026)
- 3.4 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Company Manufacturing Base and Headquarters
- 3.5 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Company Product Type and Application
- 3.6 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Company Establishment Date
- 3.7 Market Competitive Analysis
- 3.7.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
- 3.7.2 Global Top 5 and 10 Company Market Share by Revenue in 2025
- 3.7.3 2025 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 Companies
- 3.8 Mergers and Acquisitions Expansion
4 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market by Type
- 4.1 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Type Introduction
- 4.1.1 Cloud Computing Scheduling Platform
- 4.1.2 Edge Computing Scheduling Platform
- 4.1.3 Others
- 4.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Type
- 4.2.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Type (2021 VS 2025 VS 2032)
- 4.2.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Type (2021-2032)
- 4.2.3 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type (2021-2032)
5 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Market by Application
- 5.1 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Application Introduction
- 5.1.1 Energy Industry
- 5.1.2 Education Industry
- 5.1.3 Financial Industry
- 5.1.4 Others
- 5.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Application
- 5.2.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Application (2021 VS 2025 VS 2032)
- 5.2.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Application (2021-2032)
- 5.2.3 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application (2021-2032)
6 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Regional Value Analysis
- 6.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Region: 2021 VS 2025 VS 2032
- 6.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Region (2021-2032)
- 6.2.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Region: 2021-2026
- 6.2.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Region (2027-2032)
- 6.3 North America
- 6.3.1 North America Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value (2021-2032)
- 6.3.2 North America Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Country, 2025 VS 2032
- 6.4 Europe
- 6.4.1 Europe Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value (2021-2032)
- 6.4.2 Europe Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Country, 2025 VS 2032
- 6.5 Asia-Pacific
- 6.5.1 Asia-Pacific Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value (2021-2032)
- 6.5.2 Asia-Pacific Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Country, 2025 VS 2032
- 6.6 South America
- 6.6.1 South America Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value (2021-2032)
- 6.6.2 South America Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Country, 2025 VS 2032
- 6.7 Middle East & Africa
- 6.7.1 Middle East & Africa Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value (2021-2032)
- 6.7.2 Middle East & Africa Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Country, 2025 VS 2032
7 Computing Power Scheduling Platform Country-level Value Analysis
- 7.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Country: 2021 VS 2025 VS 2032
- 7.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Country (2021-2032)
- 7.2.1 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Country (2021-2026)
- 7.2.2 Global Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value by Country (2027-2032)
- 7.3 USA
- 7.3.1 USA Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.3.2 USA Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.3.3 USA Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.4 Canada
- 7.4.1 Canada Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.4.2 Canada Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.4.3 Canada Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.5 Mexico
- 7.5.1 Mexico Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.5.2 Mexico Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.5.3 Mexico Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.6 Germany
- 7.6.1 Germany Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.6.2 Germany Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.6.3 Germany Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.7 France
- 7.7.1 France Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.7.2 France Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.7.3 France Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.8 U.K.
- 7.8.1 U.K. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.8.2 U.K. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.8.3 U.K. Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.9 Italy
- 7.9.1 Italy Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.9.2 Italy Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.9.3 Italy Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.10 Spain
- 7.10.1 Spain Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.10.2 Spain Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.10.3 Spain Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.11 Russia
- 7.11.1 Russia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.11.2 Russia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.11.3 Russia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.12 Netherlands
- 7.12.1 Netherlands Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.12.2 Netherlands Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.12.3 Netherlands Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.13 Nordic Countries
- 7.13.1 Nordic Countries Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.13.2 Nordic Countries Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.13.3 Nordic Countries Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.14 China
- 7.14.1 China Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.14.2 China Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.14.3 China Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.15 Japan
- 7.15.1 Japan Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.15.2 Japan Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.15.3 Japan Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.16 South Korea
- 7.16.1 South Korea Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.16.2 South Korea Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.16.3 South Korea Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.17 India
- 7.17.1 India Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.17.2 India Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.17.3 India Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.18 Australia
- 7.18.1 Australia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.18.2 Australia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.18.3 Australia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.19 Southeast Asia
- 7.19.1 Southeast Asia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.19.2 Southeast Asia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.19.3 Southeast Asia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.20 Brazil
- 7.20.1 Brazil Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.20.2 Brazil Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.20.3 Brazil Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.21 Argentina
- 7.21.1 Argentina Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.21.2 Argentina Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.21.3 Argentina Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.22 Chile
- 7.22.1 Chile Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.22.2 Chile Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.22.3 Chile Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.23 Colombia
- 7.23.1 Colombia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.23.2 Colombia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.23.3 Colombia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.24 Peru
- 7.24.1 Peru Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.24.2 Peru Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.24.3 Peru Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.25 Saudi Arabia
- 7.25.1 Saudi Arabia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.25.2 Saudi Arabia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.25.3 Saudi Arabia Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.26 Israel
- 7.26.1 Israel Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.26.2 Israel Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.26.3 Israel Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.27 UAE
- 7.27.1 UAE Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.27.2 UAE Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.27.3 UAE Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.28 Turkey
- 7.28.1 Turkey Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.28.2 Turkey Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.28.3 Turkey Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.29 Iran
- 7.29.1 Iran Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.29.2 Iran Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.29.3 Iran Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.30 Egypt
- 7.30.1 Egypt Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Growth Rate (2021-2032)
- 7.30.2 Egypt Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Type, 2025 VS 2032
- 7.30.3 Egypt Computing Power Scheduling Platform Sales Value Share by Application, 2025 VS 2032
8 Company Profiles
- 8.1 Google
- 8.1.1 Google Company Information
- 8.1.2 Google Business Overview
- 8.1.3 Google Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.1.4 Google Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.1.5 Google Recent Developments
- 8.2 Amazon
- 8.2.1 Amazon Company Information
- 8.2.2 Amazon Business Overview
- 8.2.3 Amazon Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.2.4 Amazon Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.2.5 Amazon Recent Developments
- 8.3 Microsoft
- 8.3.1 Microsoft Company Information
- 8.3.2 Microsoft Business Overview
- 8.3.3 Microsoft Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.3.4 Microsoft Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.3.5 Microsoft Recent Developments
- 8.4 Alibaba Cloud
- 8.4.1 Alibaba Cloud Company Information
- 8.4.2 Alibaba Cloud Business Overview
- 8.4.3 Alibaba Cloud Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.4.4 Alibaba Cloud Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.4.5 Alibaba Cloud Recent Developments
- 8.5 Huawei Cloud
- 8.5.1 Huawei Cloud Company Information
- 8.5.2 Huawei Cloud Business Overview
- 8.5.3 Huawei Cloud Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.5.4 Huawei Cloud Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.5.5 Huawei Cloud Recent Developments
- 8.6 IBM
- 8.6.1 IBM Company Information
- 8.6.2 IBM Business Overview
- 8.6.3 IBM Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.6.4 IBM Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.6.5 IBM Recent Developments
- 8.7 Slurm
- 8.7.1 Slurm Company Information
- 8.7.2 Slurm Business Overview
- 8.7.3 Slurm Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.7.4 Slurm Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.7.5 Slurm Recent Developments
- 8.8 NVIDIA
- 8.8.1 NVIDIA Company Information
- 8.8.2 NVIDIA Business Overview
- 8.8.3 NVIDIA Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.8.4 NVIDIA Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.8.5 NVIDIA Recent Developments
- 8.9 Tencent
- 8.9.1 Tencent Company Information
- 8.9.2 Tencent Business Overview
- 8.9.3 Tencent Computing Power Scheduling Platform Revenue and Gross Margin (2021-2026)
- 8.9.4 Tencent Computing Power Scheduling Platform Product Portfolio
- 8.9.5 Tencent Recent Developments
9 Concluding Insights
10 Appendix
- 10.1 Reasons for Doing This Study
- 10.2 Research Methodology
- 10.3 Research Process
- 10.4 Authors List of This Report
- 10.5 Data Source
- 10.5.1 Secondary Sources
- 10.5.2 Primary Sources
GET THE RESEARCH
Choose your license.
Choose who needs access.
All options are for this report and research series.
PDF by email within 3–5 working days after payment confirmation.
Talk to an analyst